EVE Search - The Nano Problem

All Channels

EVE General Discussion

The Nano Problem

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Lady Karma State War Academy	Posted - 2008.03.20 11:52:00 - [1] Originally by: Lord WarATron 1. Heavy neut vs Nano This stratagy is more complicated than nanoing up. True, I can put a heavy neut on a Harbringer Battlecruiser, but then I wont have any fitting left for any guns? Or should everyone fly BS only now? 2. Overheated Web This stratagy is again more complecated than nanoing up. 24km scramber range vs 13km overheated web. 3. Rapier. Again, another complicated stratagy which is more complex than nanoing up. Since only 2 ships in game such as rapier and huggin get this advantage. This means caldari, Amarr and gallente will need to retrain. Its a lot more easy for those races just to nano up than to retrain. Lets be honest here, I have done the nano as well. We both know that counters exist but are pretty ineffective due to how we play. Counters work vs incompetent players, but anything works vs incompetents. Whats so complicated about using a rapier in gang? And how many nano ships want to get anywhere near a curse. I don't think it is a minmatar ship. EVE supports diversity. Not everyone wants to sit in a remote rep gang hugging a station with carrier support. Press F1-8 go make a cup of tea, come back after 5mins, and click need armour button. Woot! oh btw it's "Strategy"
Lady Karma State War Academy	Posted - 2008.03.20 11:59:00 - [2] Originally by: Lord WarATron If the nangang has the sheer numbers to win, they would primary the huginn/rapier etc. If you had a competent nanogang, what would you do? Are you really saying that good tactics and competent FC's should be be nerfed. I can't see where you are coming from, so a well skilled HAC recon gang goes out for a hunt. They come across a disorganised blob of mixed ships. Using good tactics and comms they out manouvere the enemy and get some nice kills in before they leave. How can you say that is a bad thing?
Lady Karma	Posted - 2008.03.22 02:27:00 - [3] Edited by: Lady Karma on 22/03/2008 02:27:23 Originally by: Tassill Nano cruisers have increased a large part of tactics in pvp (can't go afk and press F1-F8 if they going to fly ships well ) lastly nano cruisers have made the game booring and predictable Fixed it for you. Nano cruisers boring?!! Is that because you can't kill them in your useless missile boats OMG you are in hydra, why don't you hug a station, lose a shed load of ships and try claim victory. I am coming in hot
Lady Karma State War Academy	Posted - 2008.03.22 02:41:00 - [4] Originally by: Tassill A: What does this have to do with nano ships? B: dont edit people's post's and pretend they have said something they havent C: your a noob so post with your main or stfu A: Have a look a vid. Random blob is crap against decent nano gang B: Boo hoo, you want to press F1- f8 and think you have skills C: I will post with this alt just to expose how bad idiots like you are Good job on your FC calling ceptors as primary for the BS Grey council, god knows how you managed to get in CI. Delete your sig please, you are embarrassment
Lady Karma State War Academy	Posted - 2008.03.25 17:45:00 - [5] Originally by: Goumindong I think there is a problem with nano-gangs because they cannot easily be caught and killed in situations where they ought to be caught and killed by the blob Fixed for you. If you can't catch and kill a nano gang using "superior forces" then the conclusion must be that those forces were not "superior"
Lady Karma State War Academy	Posted - 2008.03.25 17:50:00 - [6] Originally by: Goumindong You cannot ever make bringing more ships less advantageous, its impossible in eve. It seems to work for you guys
Lady Karma State War Academy	Posted - 2008.03.25 18:01:00 - [7] Originally by: Goumindong Which brings us to the problem: there is only one viable fitting and gang option for 0.0 combat. Well thats obvious and not a problem. If you want to roam in a 5 man gang in 0.0, then the only viable fit is speed. Fleet combat is different. It is built around battleship numbers. What is your objection to people wanting to fight in 0.0 without having to get 50 people in gang. Nano gangs do not kill POS, they are fun. Recently in MM space, they dropped 5 carriers 2 MS and around 30 support on our 10 man HAC/Recon gang. We engaged a small gate camp they had...and the response is a ton of cap ships. Kill nano's and the roaming 0.0 gang is dead. Not everyone likes POS war and lock primary F1-8 lag fests
Lady Karma State War Academy	Posted - 2008.03.25 19:25:00 - [8] Originally by: Lord WarATron 15kms, 1000dps Armour Tank nano ship Yeah it costs tons of isk, but so what, its not like its going to die ever. It can freely jump into any camp and mwd/cloak back to the gate to get away with it. And with a Max skill claymore in gang, it can scramble at 45km+. But is it balanced? Not even the owner thinks so. Have you ever seen a mach fitted like that? Yeah they are everywhere If its so good, why has DHB being flying a raven for the past month?
Lady Karma State War Academy	Posted - 2008.03.26 02:15:00 - [9] Originally by: Goumindong Mwd, cloak, whole bunch of ECM and SDA's. Sensor booster might be nice too. LOL...so fitting an mwd makes it a nano ship. Have you ever undocked? It doesn't sound like you have ever flown a ship or know wtf you are talking about
Lady Karma State War Academy	Posted - 2008.03.26 02:22:00 - [10] Originally by: Goumindong But its still the same, you can't kill the nano gang, it moves on and shoots something it can kill. Do the Goons know that your making such stupid poasts. I'll have to link it for them so you can be thoroughly ridiculed
Lady Karma State War Academy	Posted - 2008.03.30 15:03:00 - [11] Edited by: Lady Karma on 30/03/2008 15:04:41 Originally by: Goumindong It doesn't matter how much you say a rapier isnt a nano-ship, it is. Ditto Zealot. Logistics repping an inty will help, but you've got to keep him under 70km[~14-20 seconds of burn, or 2 cycles] bubble does not work, if it did, it would work on gates as well[and it doesn't]. There is a reason for this. Again, you can put tanks on a vagabond, that does not make it not a nano-ship. Your trolls were almost believable at first. Now you are just being plain stupid. A nano ship, is a ship that has ...guess what, "nanofibres" fitted. Do you get it now? Edit: A Megathron with short range guns is NOT a ******* sniper you fool NO wonder you lose every fleet fight if think that a Mega can snipe with blasters.
Lady Karma	Posted - 2008.03.30 23:35:00 - [12] ITT Goumindong still manages to troll

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.